ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL AND CAPACITANCE || Electrostatic Potential and CapacitenceClass 12 Notes || Notes ||

               1. INTRODUCTION

In this topic you will learn about the electrostatic potential and the capacitance. When an external force does work in taking a body from a point to another against a force like spring force or gravitational force, that work gets stored as potential energy of the body. When the external force is removed, the body moves, gaining kinetic energy and losing an equal amount of potential energy. The sum kinetic and potential energies is thus conserved. Forces of this kind are called conservative forces. Spring force and gravitational force are examples of conservative forces. 

Coulomb force between two (stationary) charges is also a conservative force. This is not surprising, since both have inverse-square dependence on distance and differ mainly in the proportionality constants – the masses in the gravitational law are replaced by charges in Coulomb’s law. Thus, like the potential energy of a mass in a gravitational field, we can define electrostatic potential energy of a charge in an electrostatic field. Assume an electrostatic field E due to some charge configuration. First, for simplicity, consider the field E due to a charge Q placed at the origin. Now, imagine that we bring a test charge q from a point R to a point P against the repulsive force on it due to the charge Q. With reference this will happen if Q and q are both positive or both negative. For definiteness, let us take Q, q > 0. Two remarks may be made here. First, we assume that the test charge q is so small that it does not disturb the original configuration, namely the charge Q at the origin (or else, we keep Q fixed at the origin by some unspecified force). Second, in bringing the charge q from R to P, we apply an external force . F external is enough to counter the repulsive electric force FE (i.e, F external = –FE ). This means there is no net force on or acceleration of the charge q when it is brought from R to P, i.e., it is brought with infinitesimally slow constant speed. In this situation, work done by the external force is the negative of the work done by the electric force, and gets fully stored in the form of potential energy of the charge q. If the external force is removed on reaching P, the electric force will take the charge away from Q – the stored energy (potential energy) at P is used to provide kinetic energy to the charge q in such a way that the sum of the kinetic and potential energies is conserved.

This work done is against electrostatic repulsive force and gets stored as potential energy. At every point in electric field, a particle with charge q possesses a certain electrostatic potential energy, this work done increases its potential energy by an amount equal to potential energy difference between points R and P. Thus, potential energy difference. 

Therefore, we can define electric potential energy difference between two points as the work required to be done by an external force in moving 

(without accelerating) charge q from one point to another for electric field of any arbitrary charge configuration. Two important comments may be made at this stage: 

(i) The right side depends only on the initial and final positions of the charge. It means that the work done by an electrostatic field in moving a charge from one point to another depends only on the initial and the final points and is independent of the path taken to go from one point to the other. This is the fundamental characteristic of a conservative force. The concept of the potential energy would not be meaningful if the work depended on the path. The path-independence of work done by an electrostatic field can be proved using the Coulomb’s law. We omit this proof here.


     2. ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL


Consider any general static charge configuration. We define potential energy of a test charge q in terms of the work done on the charge q. This work is obviously proportional to q, since the force at any point is q E, where E is the electric field at that point due to the given charge configuration. It is, therefore, convenient to divide the work by the amount of charge q, so that the resulting quantity is independent of q. In other words, work done per unit test charge is characteristic of the electric field associated with the charge configuration. This leads to the idea of electrostatic potential V due to a given charge configuration. From Equation we get: 

Work done by external force in bringing a unit positive charge from point R to P 

where V P and V R are the electrostatic potentials at P and R, respectively. Note, as before, that it is not the actual value of potential but the potential difference that is physically significant. If, as before, we choose the potential to be zero at infinity, equation  implies: 

Work done by an external force in bringing a unit positive charge from infinity to a point = electrostatic potential (V ) at that point.


3.POTENTIAL DUE TO A POINT CHARGE

Consider a point charge Q at the origin . For definiteness, take Q to be positive. We wish to determine the potential at any point P with position vector r from the origin. For that we must calculate the work done in bringing a unit positive test charge from infinity to the point P. For Q > 0, the work done against the repulsive force on the test charge is positive. Since work done is independent of the path, we choose a convenient path – along the radial direction from infinity to the point P.


4. POTENTIAL DUE TO AN ELECTRIC DIPOLE

As we learnt in the last chapter, an electric dipole consists of two charges q and –q separated by a (small) distance 2a. Its total charge is zero. It is characterised by a dipole moment vector p whose magnitude is q × 2a and which points in the direction from –q to q . We also saw that the electric field of a dipole at a point with position vector r depends not just on the magnitude r, but also on the angle between r and p. Further, the field falls off, at large distance, not as 1/r ² (typical of field due to a single charge) but as 1/r ³. We now, determine the electric potential due to a dipole and contrast it with the potential due to a single charge. As before, we take the origin at the centre of the dipole. Now we know that the electric field obeys the superposition principle. Since potential is related to the work done by the field, electrostatic potential also follows the superposition principle. Thus, the potential due to the dipole is the sum of potentials due to the charges q and –q

The important contrasting features of electric potential of a dipole from that due to a single charge are clear from equations: 

(i) The potential due to a dipole depends not just on r but also on the angle between the position vector r and the dipole moment vector p. (It is, however, axially symmetric about p. That is, if you rotate the position vector r about p, keeping θ fixed, the points corresponding to P on the cone so generated will have the same potential as at P.) 

(i i) The electric dipole potential falls off, at large distance, as 1/r², not as 1/r, characteristic of the potential due to a single charge. 


5. POTENTIAL ENERGY OF A SYSTEM OF CHARGES

Consider first the simple case of two charges q 1 and q 2 with position vector r1 and r2 relative to some origin. Let us calculate the work done (externally) in building up this configuration. This means that we consider the charges q 1 and q 2 initially at infinity and determine the work done by an external agency to bring the charges to the given location. Suppose,first the charge q 1 is brought from infinity to the point r1. There is no external field against which work needs to be done, so work done in bringing q 1 from infinity to r1 is zero. This charge produces a potential in space given by

where r 1P is the distance of a point P in space from the location of q 1. From the definition of potential, work done in bringing charge q 2 from infinity to the point r2 is q 2 times the potential at r2  due to q 1 :

where r 12 is the distance between points 1 and 2.


6.  POTENTIAL ENERGY IN AN EXTERNAL FIELD

The source of the electric field was specified – the charges and their locations - and the potential energy of the system of those charges was determined. In this section, we ask a related but a distinct question. What is the potential energy of a charge q in a given field? This question was, in fact, the starting point that led us to the notion of the electrostatic potential. But here we address this question again to clarify in what way it is different. The main difference is that we are now concerned with the potential energy of a charge (or charges) in an external field. The external field E is not produced by the given charge(s) whose potential energy we wish to calculate. E is produced by sources external to the given charge(s).The external sources may be known, but often they are unknown or unspecified; what is specified is the electric field E or the electrostatic potential V due to the external sources. We assume that the charge q does not significantly affect the sources producing the external field. This is true if q is very small, or the external sources are held fixed by other unspecified forces. Even if q is finite, its influence on the external sources may still be ignored in the situation when very strong sources far away at infinity produce a finite field E in the region of interest. Note again that we are interested in determining the potential energy of a given charge q (and later, a system of charges) in the external field; we are not interested in the potential energy of the sources producing the external electric field. The external electric field E and the corresponding external potential V may vary from point to point. By definition, V at a point P is the work done in bringing a unit positive charge from infinity to the point P. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

S-Block Elements || S-block element class 11 chapter 8 || Group 1A, 2A elements || S block elements chapter 8 notes class 11 || Chemistry ||

Upstox referral link

Diagonal Relationship between Beryllium and Aluminium || Relation between Beryllium and Aluminium

Distinction between Electromagnetic Waves and Matter Waves